Homepages viewpoint browser fast facts

Nature vs. Nurture?

Reproductive success of the feckless cowbird may depend on social environment and 'intricate weavings of genes'


By Jayne Spencer
 

Cowbirds are any of a number of small American blackbirds (especially 'Molothrus ater') often seen near cattle. Cowbirds lay eggs in other birds' nests.

 

David White

At Canada's McMaster University, David White (above) studied the social factors that affect mate choices of Japanese quail (Cotumix japonica) and was drawn to post-doctoral work at IU because of the international reputation of animal researchers at the school. And, he said, there are few laboratories in the world with "football-field sized aviaries at their disposal."

 

 

Whom, you might ask, will love a big old cowbird?
Cowbirds are, after all, "brood parasites" not exactly a parenting skill rife with admiration. But there you have it. And for the sake of this story, try not to anthropomorphize the ethics of abandonment.

Cowbirds hatch in the nests of more than 200 different species or subspecies of birds genetically not their own. The cowbird parents deposit their eggs in the nests of others, and the nestholders raise the baby cowbirds as if they were their very own. Which could raise a host of interesting questions related to Nature vs.

Nurture if you believe in that sort of dichotomy.
Since animal behaviorists have found compelling evidence that each songbird's signature‹its songs‹is the product of guided learning, what happens to a young male cowbird and his ability to court? Will his genetic programming‹his "genetic safety net" ‹be sufficient to ensure that he develops a song and uses it to attract a mate? Those are questions IUB animal behaviorists Andrew King and Meredith West have addressed with colleagues as part of on-going research at their 93-acre field station north of Bloomington.

One scientist working along with King and West is IUB Department of Psychology's David White, a Canadian post-doctoral affiliate of IU's Center for the Integrative Study of Animal Behavior. He will have none of that Nature vs. Nurture talk.
"Behavior and physiology are composed of intricate weavings of genes developing in an environment: it makes no sense to me to try to pull the two factors apart," explained White. "It would be like me asking you to look at your hand and to tell me how many of your fingers are due to genetics and how many are due to the environment. There are no fingers without genetics. There are no fingers without environment."

King, West and White are currently at work on a project investigating how different social environments impact the development of cowbirds' communication and courtship abilities.
"We created different social environments with a very simple, natural manipulation: we put cowbirds of different age classes together," White said.

Four distinct "cowbird cultures" at the field station differ in the age classes of the males present. Each aviary has adult and juvenile females. In addition, one has adult and juvenile males; one has only adult males and no juveniles; one has juvenile males and no adults; and one has only females, no males.What White has noted thus far:

  • Juvenile male cowbirds housed without adults sing more than any of the other birds. Their songs are well developed, but they don't know "what to do with them," said White. "They never sing directed songs to females‹a must for courtship success‹and they rarely sing directed songs to males." Instead, they sing soliloquies all day long and act "spaced out."
  • Adult males housed with juvenile males stopped singing early in the fall. White thinks the adult males don't want the juveniles to steal their best "grown-up" cowbird songs.
  • Female behavior differs across cowbird cultures. Females housed with just juvenile males stay to themselves, never interacting with males. Females housed with just adult males sit very near males, approach them and allow male serenades with relish.
    The breeding season is coming up, and White will be documenting the mating behavior to see what differences there will be in the males' reproductive success across groups.
"At which point," said White, "we want to make a conclusion that the social environment had the effect of launching these groups of birds down very different developmental trajectories that can lead to very substantial differences in reproductive success and, thus, be of evolutionary importance."

Interacting in a social setting is hard, because conditions are always changing, White said, and the cowbirds have to learn to deal with these changes and change with them‹hard-wired programs of behavior just don't work well, and the animals have to learn and adapt quickly.

"But even though some aspects may change daily, the social environment is, at the same time, stable and dependable across generations," White explained. "This stability allows the new generation to inherit the secrets of social success-‹good genes, a good environment and good information."

 

 

Return to Table of Contents
Comments: homepgs@indiana.edu